Scent of a Woman movie analysis

SCENT OF A WOMAN ANALYSIS. FIRST-HAND WITH CHARLIE SIMMS

This unevident piece of dialogue between Charlie and Mrs. Rossi presents the entry valuable information on one of the most well-known characters in movie history. “They” that way signifies both the family (Frank’s older brother) and the society, which once glorified the war hero and a man of power. These first lines about the Lt. Colonel reveal the deep motivation and conflict of the character. Frank Slade, as even his embittered nephew recognizes, was once a war hero, a significant figure.

His name was once pronounced and praised on a pair with the generals and even Lyndon Johnson, the president of the United States. Headwaiters of luxury hotels and restaurants, VIP cigar sellers, and escort service providers of New York and Washington. They all once recognized Frank by the only means of his name or voice. Now the colonel is deprived of his former status and forced to live in the dark in a veteran orphanage or his niece’s house, a grim start for the Scent of a Woman analysis. 

Mrs. Rossi’s notice comes true by the indignation of the Colonel himself, who does not praise a polite treatment of him. Let us turn to the dictionary meaning of the word ‘’Sir’’. ‘Used for a polite or respectful way of addressing a man, especially in a position of authority’. Although this definition can mirror the military rank, and it does not exclude other kinds of status, for Colonel Slade (who lives blind world, on a veteran’s pension, in his niece’s house) ‘’Sir’’ form of address was a bitter reminder of the good old days.

Already the second minute of an intense dialogue with Charlie makes a strong reference to one of the Colonel’s patrons from the 1960s (Lyndon Johnson). Thus, Frank finds a moment of consolidation in feeling involved in affairs of national importance. This necessity still shapes his keeping with the character of the past VIP.

We should pay only measured attention to the Colonel’s derisive tone on Charlie’s Oregon origin, as Frank in deen and not in name honors his young fellow as a hard worker cultivated within a family of hard workers. He is well aware of the Baird school’s high status and confronting this information with Charlie’s scholarship will push forward their relations. By this means, one of the most prominent monologues in movie history (Frank addressing the disciplinary commission) was given light inside this dark smoked room as a matter of ironical dispute between a blind retired Lt. Colonel and a student with some previous “skin issues”.

The colonel mocks his niece, her husband, and her children, while in fact, he respects them, especially for taking care of a blind rude uncle. At this point, Frank’s rejection of his status necessitates him to ostentatious neglect. Colonel Slade suffers from frustration and does not respect himself, which has little in common with his surroundings. Having won back his past VIP status in New York, Colonel will no longer descend to such attacks, and his final reconciliation with himself is reflected in a scene with the children.

At the beginning of the story, Frank is aggravated with himself being not in a position to drive his own life. His “Dismissed!” on Charlie means nothing as Mrs. Rossi has already decided to hire Charlie. The man, whose voice once raised the roofs, now has no voice to vote for his new “seater”. One of the later scenes with Frank’s “I hate goodbyes” reveals the fact that he was chagrined while saying goodbye to Mrs. Rossi.

Clock-and-sword gentleman from New York: Frank Slade character analysis

At the door of a trip to New York, Charlie comes with the job to listen to new derogatory epithets in his address and On a kindly Mrs. Rossi. Not yet being on board the 1st class, the Colonel exudes irritation and neglect of others. As we have already figured out above, in fact, Frank can only be angry with himself.

Colonel Slade is unable to accept the fact that he has become a blind veteran, without friends and “important” connections, unable to even cross the street without help. Being completely dependent on the state (disability checks), on his niece, and now on Charlie, Frank Slade behaves as if he asks for support when he needs it.

One step from his former status, the Colonel once again recalls the times of Lyndon Johnson. He plans to go over the walls of his niece’s care for two days, squandering a veteran’s pension but behaves as if he will speak at the inauguration of the President of the United States in the status of a guest of honor.

In this important moment, Colonel Slade takes ‘’Sir’’ with self-pleasure. Like a turtle, he managed to escape from the shell of a routine, sitting in a chair with a cigarette. He purposely seeks confirmation of his high status as a first-class passenger and in a certain way provokes a young man to appeal to ‘’Sir’’. A privilege of graciousness, which he had previously denied to Charlie Simms.

Feeding pleasant memories of the past “good old days’’, Frank admits that he never was a person of the first magnitude, and sometimes he had to endure an almost humiliating attitude. The same he renders Charlie back at home. Now, being a key performer this weekend in New York, the Colonel shows respect to other people who provide him with gentlehood or services.

Frank praises the efforts of a young costume-servant woman, his driver Manny, a head waiter, the Puerto Rican porter, Ferrari dealer. The colonel will become an instant owner of his own Ferrari, which once was a matter of high status for him. However, by the time we pay attention only to Frank’s sad comments about suicide, the moment reveals more. Frank comes to the fact that it is not a Ferrari, which defines a man. He suffers the understanding of the life he once considered as of high value, in fact in many ways far from reality.

Originating in this scene, Frank now advertises his young assistant to women, his family. Regardless of his initial irony, the Colonel gives great value to the hard workers, and a craving for betterment, which he lacks himself. Frank indeed gratifies self-integrity to be far from the top of the mountain but to do the work every single day. Thirty years early he was a young companion to the men of power and now he patronages Charlie in the same manner.

Facing the truth. Scent of a woman moral lesson

Frank used to humiliate people who did speak aloud about his status as a blind veteran on the fringes of the former status. Finding oneself in New York, Colonel Slade felt himself to be once again a significant, formerly high-ranking personality. The first-class tickets, a hotel room at the Waldorf Astoria, a private limousine, dinner at the ‘’$24 hamburger’’ restaurant, Jack Daniels as a companion, elegant costumes, generous tips, a Ferrari test drive, and finally an evening with a terrific woman.   

Assessing his real situation, Frank blamed blindness on his helplessness. At the same time, he was idealizing the former ‘’glorious times’’ in the G-2 intelligence, as well as being full of cynicism towards the surroundings. The Colonel did not accept his new status. In New York, he again felt like a person, but blindness in no way prevented him from being one.

Frank believed that the woman would not go with him, except for money, but it turned out to be self-deception. He fascinates women, not so much with his status, costume, and money, as with charisma. Donna was fascinated by Frank thirty years older than her. Acquaintance with the school teacher will later open the fact that only he saw a “defect” in himself.

Frank’s blindness was not a means of rejecting a Ferrari ride, which indeed dreams come true for millions of people. It was far from an obstacle to tango with a gorgeous young woman, and gain attention from other VIPs. The later famous monologue at Baird found no excuses in blindness to deliver his message and to shift the climate of thoughts, fascinate a woman, and protect his young friend Charlie.

Other people see us the same way we see ourselves. People took Frank as a rude blind disabled as a reflection of his own treatment of himself when he spoke and acted in that manner. A gripping scene of a family war of words signifies this cause-and-effect relation. All about the fact, that Frank does not need to act as the Colonel he was before to inspire respect and to be polite with the other people.

The disturbing tragedy of Frank Slade deals a little with a loss of eyesight but in large measures against his rejection of reality. Staying close to Randy’s (his nephew) comments, Frank had hard luck long before the incident with a grenade. Five years before the present events, Colonel was already unmannered to people, used to get drunk, and complained about the “good old” 1960s. In a determinate movie sense, Frank now has a new reason for being, personated in Charlie. When Slade heard that the biological father left the family, Frank could not do the same way and leave Charlie on his own. Later on, the final scene within a courtyard reveals the fact that Frank has finally accepted his current state. His new patrimony deals nothing with a battlefield, but rather with people, whom he cares about.

Integrity and courage of Charlie Simms. The scent of a woman ending explained

Scent of a Woman has become a true-life movie legend in large part thanks to Al Pacino and his momentous acting. However, let’s shift our focus, and even leave an Oscar for the best actor for a while to draw our attention to Charlie Simms as the protagonist. We have several justified reasons to manage this venturesome movie gamble.

• Charlie becomes a part of the story in the second minute of the movie, whereas Frank appears on the horizon only seven minutes later to disappear till the 29. The dramatic narrative of the first part fully falls on the shoulders of Mrs. Charlie Simms.
• Let’s call on the general “main character” meaning: the protagonist is the character with the most urgent dramatic want; or, the most pressing physical goal. It is the conflict between the conscience and the improvement of one’s conditions that defines the ultimate theme of the movie and how The Scent of a Woman is explained. Frank’s goal is to be shaped by his plan to spend a weekend in New York and to take his own life. We should also consider the Colonel’s necessity of finding a purpose to live as the forcing motive of the movie, yet Charlie’s story still prevails.
• Charlie is forced to be shaped by Frank’s influence. This very relation reveals the moral orienting points and the story of our main character. His moral virtues, integrity, and courage, pass tests.

The never-to-be-forgotten monologue by Frank Slade includes the lines, that cultivate and declare two moral virtues, the Colonel himself lacks. Integrity and courage run deep into Charlie’s character as inseparable qualities, none of which should be neglected. We may put into the spotlight some more examples of Frank bringing Charlie’s soul into the open.   

Frank makes us partners in the crime of fooling around his young partner and taking advantage of Charlie’s simple-minded behavior. In a broader sense, the Colonel himself takes some virtues of Charlie for a ride of pretending to be a VIP guest in New York. He leaves out his rudeness, sarcastic comments, and arrogant attitude. While in his pursuit of the past, the Colonel adopts the best version of himself next to Charlie and his virtues. To this extent, a 17-year-old pupil with the “blackhead story” possesses personal qualities, not merely Frank but also modern society lacks.

We should keep in mind that Charlie did not tell the truth to Mr. Trask, first in his office and then during the disciplinary meeting. Nevertheless, let’s remind ourselves of the details of that “dishonesty”. Every time Principal Trask addresses Charlie with a direct question of who is responsible for the abusive incident, Charlie actually gives him a direct answer. He cannot say. In moral contrast to George, Charlie does not shelter himself behind poor sight, inconvenient viewing angles, or misty weather. Charlie speaks his own truth, that he can not say who it was, just can’t. In this respect, Charlie is still true to his INTEGRITY.  

The second main moral lighthouse of Charlie is characterized by Frank as COURAGE. One can doubt, that Charlie embodies the lack of self-confidence all movie long. He feels frustrated over the fact, that he has to go to New York with Colonel. The disciplinary meeting shows Charlie a trapped kid, who does not have a stomach for defending his honor. These obvious moments depict Charlie in the role of a coward, which is of course far from the truth. Let’s delve into a few of the arguments against it.

‘’I won a Young America merit scholarship’’. Charlie has already shown the strength to stand out in the crowd of his own Gresham, Oregon. He left home, his mother, and a stepfather with a convenience store and a perspective of running a business on his own. He made his way to the Baird school.

Charlie shows courage, being in the center of a foreign environment. While his rich friends are dreaming of getting out of school, reminiscent of a medieval castle, Charlie, enjoys studying here. While the other guys laugh at his financial position, Charlie protects them. He is trying to earn money for a ticket home for Thanksgiving and he has the courage not to ask his mother and stepfather, who would be pleased to do this.

Although Charlie has already earned the respect of the principal Trask, he refuses to make a deal and accept the bribe. Yet with his voice being shaken, he is on the straight not to reveal the names of the other boys. Being on his own with his conscience, Charlie refused to take the patronage and a “provided” place at Harvard. He does not need such a favor, but only a chance to use his own efforts. He does not seek financial help from the boys either.  

When Frank introduces Charlie to women to the best advantage of his young companion, the young man finds the courage not to overemphasize his virtues, and this courage is shaped by modesty. Donna is charmed by Frank but still fascinated with Charlie. They will never see each other again, but leaving the room with her latecomer, Donna looks over her shoulder. I would like to believe she minded both Frank and Charlie.

Charlie constantly shows courage by telling the truth to Frank. A small irony about George Bush grades into Jack Daniels and finalizes with the indeed Frank’s situation. In return, Charlie has to take the humiliation and even a physical menace, which does not stop him from telling the truth. He refuses to leave the room a few moments before Colonel tends to commit suicide. Charlie stays where he is even at the point of the bayonet and throws himself to save the Colonel. A 17-year-old pupil against a mature man with military training. Charlie denied to value all possible dangers, rather agonizing his courage. He is even ready to provoke Frank for his own murder to reach out to his patron.